CORN2664 L. Cornelius (197, cf. 219) Lentulus

Status

  • Patrician

Life Dates

  • 43, proscribed (Hinard 1985) Expand

    Possibly proscribed. Hinard 43 no. 47

Relationships

son of
? Publicia (27) (flaminica Martial. after 71) (DPRR Team)
L. Cornelius (234) Lentulus Niger (pr. before 60) (Zmeskal 2009) Expand

Cic. Att. II 24.2, Cic. Att. IV 18.1

brother of
? L. Cornelius (196) Lentulus (flam. Martial.? 56) (DPRR Team)
? P. Cornelius (205) Lentulus (son of L. Cornelius (234) Lentulus Niger (pr. before 60)) (DPRR Team)
married to
? Scribonia (32) (daughter of L. Scribonius (19) Libo (pr.? 80)) (AE) Expand

2008 84

father of
? Cn. Cornelius (180) L. f. Lentulus (Marcellinus)? (son of? L. Cornelius (197, cf. 219) Lentulus (cos. suff. 38)) (AE) Expand

2008 84

Career

  • Praetor 44 provincia declined (Broughton MRR II) Expand
    • Perhaps a Praetor in 44, since he is listed among those who considered the allotment of provinces in the Senate meeting on November 28 as null and void (Cic. Phil. 3.25). (Broughton MRR II)
    • Pr. 44. In MRR 2.321, delete the word perhaps, as his claim is as good as that of the others in Cic. Phil. 3.25. Sumner notes that he may be a son of Lentulus Niger (234), candidate for the consulship of 58 (Cic. Vat. 25), in which case his filiation was probably L. f. L. n., or else a son of Lentulus Crus (218), consul 49, and his filiation would be L. f. P. n. The cognomen Cruscellio (Val. Max. 6.6.3; cf. Cruscello in the Chron. of 354 on the cos. suff. of 38 [MRR 2.390]), if it is his, would favor the latter view. See Sumner, Orators 142-143, with a stemma which distinguishes the two, but see also Phoenix 25, 1971, 365. (Broughton MRR III)
  • Consul Suffectus 38 (Broughton MRR II) Expand
    • Fast. Mag. Vic., Degrassi 282f., 287f.; Fast. Biond., ibid. 291f.; and see 135, 506f.; on Cornelius, Forlati, Epigraphica 3 (1941) 272: C. Norbano, L. Lentulo Cos.; cf. Groag, Laur. Aquinc. 2.32, note 13; Degrassi 287f. (Broughton MRR II)