The praenomen Titus in Diod. and the numeral II after Lanatusin Chr. 354 point to the Consul of 452, but L. is clear in the text tradition of Livy and Cassiod., and is accepted by Münzer (RE). Degrassi (95) identifies this Consul with that of 452, but if L. in Livy is correct he was a son of the Consul of 452 and a brother of that of 439. (Broughton MRR I)
Liv. 4.12.6; Diod. 12.36.1; Chr. 354 (Macerino et Lanato II); Chr. Pasc. ({Gr}); Cassiod.; Degrassi 95, 370f. (Broughton MRR I)