COCC2806 M. Cocceius (13) Pap.? Nerva

Status

  • Patrician

Life Dates

  • 80?, birth (Rüpke 2005)

Relationships

brother of
? L. Cocceius (12) Nerva (brother of? M. Cocceius (13) Pap.? Nerva (cos. 36)) (RE)

Career

  • Proquaestor Pro Propraetore 41 Italia (Broughton MRR II) Expand
    • Proquaestor pro praetore under Mark Antony (Grueber, CRRBM 2.491f.), and probably took part with Lucius Antonius in the Perusine war (App. BC 5.61). (Broughton MRR II)
    • Cos. 36. Pro quaestore pro praetore 41. In MRR 2.373, refer also to Crawford, RRC 1.525, no. 517, 41 B.C. Proconsul 38. In MRR 2.392, note also an inscription of Ephesus, AEpig. 1968, no. 480, in which he is honored by quei Ephesi | [negotiantur]; cf. nos. 485 and 486. In MRR 2, p. 392, read Teos, not Tenos. (Broughton MRR III)
  • Moneyer 41 (RRC) Expand
    • ref. 517 (RRC)
  • Quindecemvir Sacris Faciundis? 39 to after 31 (Rüpke 2005) Expand
    • A probable member of this college of priests about 31 B. C. In a number of instances the exact date when a priest became a member of his college is not known, and the conjecture is based on evidence of seniority such as the date of the consulship or some other office. The list of the Quindecimviri is based on Miss Hoffman's observation that the names listed in connection with the Saecular Games in 17 B. C. are arranged in the order of entrance into the college (see AJPh 73 [19521289-294). The names given below are drawn from Miss Hoffman's dissertation, The Membership of the Four Major Colleges of Priests from 44 B. C. to 37 A. D. (Bryn Mawr, 1951, available in microfilm). The order of names and the seniority of careers indicate that the following men, who belonged to the college of Quindecimviri in 17 B. C., were members in 31 (CIL 6.32323-ILS 5050). See M. Hollmann, AJPh 73 (1952) 289-294. (Broughton MRR II)
    • A patrician after 29. See PIR² 2.290, no. 1224; De Laet no. 120. (Broughton MRR II)
  • Proconsul 38 Asia (Broughton MRR II) Expand
    • Honored at Tenos (SEG 4. 604) and Lagina of Caria (ILS 8780) as Imperator and Consul Designatus. Groag (PIR² 2.290, no. 1224) believes that he may have been only a Legate or a Prefect of Antony (he was Proquaestor pro praetore in 41), but more probably he was governor of Asia, and perhaps succeeded Plancus in this year and returned to assume the consulship in 36 (see Symo, Roman Revolution 266, note 3; Magic, Roman Rule in Asia Minor 2.1580). (Broughton MRR II)
    • Cos. 36. Pro quaestore pro praetore 41. In MRR 2.373, refer also to Crawford, RRC 1.525, no. 517, 41 B.C. Proconsul 38. In MRR 2.392, note also an inscription of Ephesus, AEpig. 1968, no. 480, in which he is honored by quei Ephesi | [negotiantur]; cf. nos. 485 and 486. In MRR 2, p. 392, read Teos, not Tenos. (Broughton MRR III)
  • Proconsul? 37 Asia (Broughton MRR II) Expand
    • See 38, Promagistrates. (Broughton MRR II)
  • Consul 36 (Broughton MRR II) Expand
    • CIL 11.6673, 19; Fast. Cap., Degrassi 58f. (L. G[elliu]s L. f. L. n. [-]), 135, 506f.; Fast. Mag. Vic., ibid. 282, 288; Fast. Biond., ibid. 291f. Q-] Cocceiu[s -]); Dio 49, Index, and 1.1, and 24.1; Chr. 354; Fast. Hyd.; Chr. Pasc.; Cassiod.; and on Cocceius, ILS 8780; SEG 4.604, Consul Designate; see PIR² 2.290, no. 1224; De Laet no. 120. (Broughton MRR II)