Held office from November 1 (Fast. Ven., Degrassi 251, 254f.; Fast. Pinc., ibid. 277f.; Fast. Mag. Vic., ibid. 283, 288, cf. 136, 508f.). On his filiation and cognomen, see Degrassi 251; Cuntz, JOEAI 25 (1929) 72. (Broughton MRR II)
Cos. Suff. 34. See MRR 2.411 and 416. Cadoux holds that the consul of 34 may well be a descendant of such known Herennii as the consul of 93. But if he was the father of the consul suffectus of A.D. 1 (M. Herennius M. f. M'. n. Picens) his filiation should be M'. f. See PIR(2) H 118; Wiseman, NM 235, no. 205. If the Picene leader in the Social War, T. Herennius, was his grandfather his praenomen would be omitted, as in the case of Asinius Pollio's grandfather.[101x]
(Broughton MRR III)
Possibly Proconsul in Asia (see Cuntz, JOEAI 25 [1929] 72, who believes that the inscription of Ephesus, GIBM 3.521-SIG³ 784, refers to this man and not to his son [Cos. Suff. 1 A. D.], a view accepted by Grant, From Imperium to Auctoritas 395, and tentatively by Magie, Roman Rule in Asia Minor 2.1580). (Broughton MRR II)
Cos. Suff. 34. See MRR 2.411 and 416. Cadoux holds that the consul of 34 may well be a descendant of such known Herennii as the consul of 93. But if he was the father of the consul suffectus of A.D. 1 (M. Herennius M. f. M'. n. Picens) his filiation should be M'. f. See PIR(2) H 118; Wiseman, NM 235, no. 205. If the Picene leader in the Social War, T. Herennius, was his grandfather his praenomen would be omitted, as in the case of Asinius Pollio's grandfather.[101x]
(Broughton MRR III)